Testing Cosmetics on Animals Needs to Stop!

New Hampshire: Testing Cosmetics on Animals Needs to Stop!

Name of Bill: Prohibition on Animal Testing

Bill Number: SB 202

Humane CosmeticsCosmetics testing causes unnecessary pain and harm to animals, and alternative testing methods exist that are often cheaper and more accurate predictors for how cosmetics and their ingredients will affect humans. This reality has led eight states (California, Illinois, Nevada, Virginia, Maryland, New Jersey, Hawaii and Maine) to enact laws that effectively ban the sale of cosmetics that were produced using animal testing. In New Hampshire, passage of SB 202 could make the state the ninth in the nation to pass this popular legislation. 

SB 202 would ban the sale of cosmetics that have been developed using animal testing, with some exceptions. Banning the sale of animal-tested cosmetics is a big step towards reducing the suffering of animals in laboratories because the effect expands well beyond New Hampshire. As more states take up similar legislation, manufacturers around the country will be forced to reexamine their animal testing practices if they want to stay relevant in the marketplace.

 

Calls to Action:

  1. Please contact your state Senators and urge them to support this bill.
  2. Spread the word! Share this page with your social network.

 

Recipients

  • Your State Senator or Senators

Contact

*Required fields
 

If you take action and have not already registered, you will receive periodic updates and communications from National Anti-Vivisection Society.

Message

Please support SB 202 to end the sale of cosmetics tested on animals

Dear [Decision Maker],

I am writing to ask for your support of SB 202 to end sale of cosmetics that are developed using animal testing. Safe and reliable non-animal safety tests have existed for years, and hundreds of brands already sell cosmetics that are cruelty free.

If you are worried that this legislation is anti-business, I assure you it isn't. The Federal Humane Cosmetics Act, which was introduced in the House and Senate last year and shares the same goal as SB 202, is supported by the Personal Care Products Council, a trade organization representing 90% of the U.S. cosmetics industry. The federal bill has also been endorsed by more than 350 individual companies, including Unilever and Proctor & Gamble.

Another important point for consideration is that the cosmetics industry already relies heavily on more predictive, non-animal testing methods to evaluate product safety, demonstrating that an end to the use of animals will not negatively impact human health.

Banning the sale of animal-tested products in our state is important because it will have vibrating effects across the entire cosmetics industry and impact their decisions on manufacturing and development using cruel and unnecessary practices.

Please support passage of SB 202 to ensure New Hampshire helps lead the fight in the global movement towards cruelty-free cosmetics.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State ZIP]